<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Collection count changes during Reactor runs]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/10066/" />
	<updated>2026-04-14T19:52:09Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/10066/collection-count-changes-during-reactor-runs/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Collection count changes during Reactor runs]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83239/#p83239" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Ahh!&nbsp; That does make sense. My primary concern was that some mined strategies were getting lost. But it sounds like this is not the case.</p><p>Thank you for clarifying!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dusktrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/5552/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-14T19:52:09Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83239/#p83239</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Collection count changes during Reactor runs]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83238/#p83238" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It can &quot;shrink&quot; because of correlations. </p><p>For example, let&#039;s consider two strategies with similar but outside-the-correlation-threshold balance curves. Let&#039;s name them &quot;A&quot; and &quot;B&quot;.<br />Let&#039;s the Generator create a new strategy (&quot;C&quot;) with a balance curve shape between the two.</p><br /><p>It is completely possible now to have A correlated with C and C correlated with B.<br />The Generator will first remove B (because it has the lower balance), and then remove C.</p><p>As a result, we will have 1 strategy remaining instead of the initial two.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-14T19:25:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83238/#p83238</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Collection count changes during Reactor runs]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83237/#p83237" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />I am running multiple different Chrome instances to leverage all of my CPU cores. Each instance runs an identical set of Reactor settings.</p><p>I noticed recently that the number of strategies added to my collection seems to vary over time and I just observed it in real-time this morning.</p><p>For example, about an hour ago the collection counts across 5 Chrome instances were:<br />1, 5, 5, 3, 5</p><p>and now an hour later they have updated to:<br />1, 5, 5, 3, 4</p><p>I&#039;m aware that in a given Chrome instance, the number of Collection strategies will be lower than the Ascended count due to the correlation filtering. This is all fine.</p><p>My concern is that I don&#039;t understand how a collection can grow and then shrink like this?</p><p>Is this a bug?<br />Happy to send any details you need.<br />Thank you</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dusktrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/5552/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-14T14:39:52Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83237/#p83237</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
