Retry Count

Hi Popov,

may I know, what do these lines mean?

#define TRADE_RETRY_COUNT 4
#define TRADE_RETRY_WAIT  100

If I want to increase the closing retry number, should I modify those lines?

or maybe this line?

Print("Close Position retry no: "+IntegerToString(attempt+2));

Regards.

Slight collection issue

Another thing - when I open studio for the first time and hit the collection, no strats are shown, although there's a number after Collection. I can bring strats back by hitting the recalc button.

A little illustration.

FSB Pro Wish List - Requested features

Blaiserboy wrote:

A lot of time has gone into this program and its efficiencies.

Not everyone has the computer power to efficiently process all of the add ons that people require.

There are a gazillion techniques and theories available and all seem to be necessary, however, there is only so much can be incorporated without costing convenience and efficiency.

The developer is actually quite well versed in many aspects of automated trading systems and as time passes he is adding more and more to the program while attempting to keep the users in mind.

There are several things that I wish to see in the program however I realize that what I would like to see will restrict other people from being able to process their data with efficiency.

Therefore. what I do. is maximise the features that the program already has, and there are many.

That is why I suggested that you spend a few weeks learning about what the program actually can accomplish for you instead of focusing on what it can not do.

Blaiser you are right, thanks for point it out



jetaro wrote:

Hi Vini, I think the "filter non-linear balance pattern" option in the control panel under acceptance criteria will check for a linear balance curve.

Thank you jetaro I'll check it out

Popov wrote:

Hello ViniQ,

Regrading the fix trade ratio, it is significantly easier to change the entry amount in your expert once it reaches $6000 instead of adding such option in FSB Pro.

Correlation coefficient sounds interesting, however it looks exactly as our "filter non-linear balance pattern" as Jetaro already answered.

You can open a separate topic for that and to explain the how it is calculated. If we find it the formula appropriate for FSB Pro we can implement it (I hope it will not take 3 seconds to be calculated smile ). You understand that every new feature makes the program slower and more resource demanding. Just compare FSB Pro to EA Studio and you will see. I'm totally convinced that the simpler systems work much better than the complex., however it took me 15 years of writing mathematical models and simulations to find it. But no, the users always want more complex.

My next program will be 14 gigabytes, will use 16 cores and will require 64 GB of RAM I'll make it 10 times more expansive and will call it FSB Enterprise. It will have menus with all the known terms in the industry. And guess, it will calculate a strategy for one hour. Even I can add a text box, where the users will be able to add their own terms and phrases for the menus.

Prepurchase open: now FSB Enterprise is 80% off - $7000.

Thanks a lot for the suggestion about the fix trade ratio,
I'm learning a lot about programming reading the lines of the expert advisor generated by builder.
With this explicit answer and it's making a lot of sense to me everything you've explained

Hannes wrote:

Sign me up for FSB Enterprise big_smile

If it is not inappropriate to ask, I would like to be the 2nd in line to test FSB Enterprise, I'm already raising money for it! lol lol lol

Total respect for you guys, keep up the great work big_smile

Expert Advisor Studio - Wish list

Yes I also made experiment with various browser, from chrome to edge, I even tried least popular browsers such as midori and vivaldi. But the cpu usage never exceeded one core per window.

I'm aware that I can run it on multiple browser windows, so it will utilize more cores.

MetaTrader Bar Closing issue and fix with Forex Strategy Builder

I think this one should be a sticky note

FSB Pro Wish List - Requested features

Thanks, welcome on board. However, before this sinks here into complete nonsense. There is a similar function already as a "Retry Wait Function" in the Action Trade.mph. Professional programmers are there already. I suppose that up to now only still of no one sensible coordination has needed. Besides, I think of the large amount in indicators and the variation possibilities resulting from it. And these do not become less.

FSB Pro Wish List - Requested features

Sign me up for FSB Enterprise big_smile

FSB Pro Wish List - Requested features

Blaiserboy wrote:
tho.schu wrote:

I need an opportunity to organize the risk management system optimally when several strategies are used. An idea is the inclusion of a Coundown, which shifts the position opening into the future (in milliseconds) and whose settings are made in the EA code (orAction trade 4/5 .mph).

The problem was addressed here:

http://forexsb.com/forum/topic/6528/que … rdination/
http://forexsb.com/forum/topic/6237/pri … trategies/

I think you may need a professional coder to develop such to include in your Strategies

An idea may be to create a 'supervisor' strategy using global variables to control order flow from your strategies.



Supervisor Strategy. Wonderful idea. However, at the moment an easier one, the described version is enough for me.

It must go only fast. Otherwise, I despair.

FSB Pro Wish List - Requested features

Hello ViniQ,

Regrading the fix trade ratio, it is significantly easier to change the entry amount in your expert once it reaches $6000 instead of adding such option in FSB Pro.

Correlation coefficient sounds interesting, however it looks exactly as our "filter non-linear balance pattern" as Jetaro already answered.

You can open a separate topic for that and to explain the how it is calculated. If we find it the formula appropriate for FSB Pro we can implement it (I hope it will not take 3 seconds to be calculated smile ). You understand that every new feature makes the program slower and more resource demanding. Just compare FSB Pro to EA Studio and you will see. I'm totally convinced that the simpler systems work much better than the complex., however it took me 15 years of writing mathematical models and simulations to find it. But no, the users always want more complex.

My next program will be 14 gigabytes, will use 16 cores and will require 64 GB of RAM I'll make it 10 times more expansive and will call it FSB Enterprise. It will have menus with all the known terms in the industry. And guess, it will calculate a strategy for one hour. Even I can add a text box, where the users will be able to add their own terms and phrases for the menus.

Prepurchase open: now FSB Enterprise is 80% off - $7000.

Strategy Reactor

.it gives total different results!

Yesterday a user called me that he opened a strategy in a separate tab in FSB and it showed a different result. However it appeared that the first runs on GBPUSD and the second on GPBJPY. Oh, and the Stop Loss was 14 points vs 148 points.

..

what is the difference between ea studio and Pro (in entry/exit term...)?

How difficult is to see it alone:

http://s10.postimg.org/xv6ebd3b9/screenshot_184.jpg


EA Studio opens and closes positions only at Bar Open. If you set the same entry and exit rules in FSB Pro and use entry at Bar Open and exit at Bar Close, you will receive the same results provided that you are using the same data and settings.